\begin{figure}[!t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r    | @{}r         | @{}c@{}        | @{}c@{}          |        @{}c         |}\hline
  &   &                 & Median  & Spread     & Reduction Quartiles \\
Rank  & Goal & Change & Reduc   & Reduc      &        50\% \\\hline
1     & defects & ReduceFunct &    64\% &   28\% & \boxplot{45.7467}{18.5461}{64.2928}{9.93909}{74.2319}\\ 
1     & defects & W &    54\% &   32\% & \boxplot{33.117}{21.349}{54.466}{10.4747}{64.9407}\\ 
1     & defects & ToolsTech &    51\% &   39\% & \boxplot{33.1779}{17.372}{50.5499}{21.6912}{72.2411}\\ 
1     & defects & ProcMaturity &    39\% &   73\% & \boxplot{0}{38.5634}{38.5634}{33.5112}{72.0746}\\ 
2     & defects & Personel &    23\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{23.2532}{23.2532}{76.7084}{99.9616}\\ 
3     & defects & ReduceQuality &     0\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9505}{99.9505}\\ 
4     & defects & RelaxScedule &   -20\% &   43\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & effort & ReduceFunct &    62\% &   28\% & \boxplot{43.8475}{17.8433}{61.6909}{9.78052}{71.4714}\\ 
2     & effort & W &    58\% &   32\% & \boxplot{41.1765}{16.6389}{57.8154}{15.8471}{73.6625}\\ 
2     & effort & ToolsTech &    46\% &   22\% & \boxplot{39.7918}{6.55582}{46.3476}{15.7704}{62.1181}\\ 
2     & effort & ProcMaturity &    24\% &   76\% & \boxplot{0}{23.9029}{23.9029}{49.3219}{73.2248}\\ 
2     & effort & ReduceQuality &     0\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6845}{99.6845}\\ 
2     & effort & Personel &     0\% &  105\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6615}{99.6615}\\ 
3     & effort & RelaxScedule &   -13\% &   35\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & months & ReduceFunct &    37\% &   16\% & \boxplot{26.6932}{9.94021}{36.6334}{6.15848}{42.7918}\\ 
1     & months & Personel &    32\% &   98\% & \boxplot{0}{31.5735}{31.5735}{65.9772}{97.5507}\\ 
1     & months & W &    30\% &   16\% & \boxplot{19.0595}{11.1223}{30.1817}{5.04286}{35.2246}\\ 
1     & months & ToolsTech &    29\% &   26\% & \boxplot{14.7299}{13.9786}{28.7085}{11.5873}{40.2958}\\ 
1     & months & ProcMaturity &    29\% &   33\% & \boxplot{4.70219}{23.8499}{28.5521}{8.68562}{37.2378}\\ 
1     & months & ReduceQuality &     0\% &   98\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{97.619}{97.619}\\ 
2     & months & RelaxScedule &    -3\% &   16\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 

\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the Ground case study.}
\label{fig:drastic-ground}
\end{figure}


\begin{figure}[!t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r    | @{}r         | @{}c@{}        | @{}c@{}          |        @{}c         |}\hline
  &   &                 & Median  & Spread     & Reduction Quartiles \\
Rank  & Goal & Change & Reduc   & Reduc      &        50\% \\\hline
1     & defects & ReduceFunct &    64\% &   28\% & \boxplot{45.7467}{18.5461}{64.2928}{9.93909}{74.2319}\\ 
1     & defects & W &    54\% &   32\% & \boxplot{33.117}{21.349}{54.466}{10.4747}{64.9407}\\ 
1     & defects & ToolsTech &    51\% &   39\% & \boxplot{33.1779}{17.372}{50.5499}{21.6912}{72.2411}\\ 
1     & defects & ProcMaturity &    39\% &   73\% & \boxplot{0}{38.5634}{38.5634}{33.5112}{72.0746}\\ 
1     & defects & Personel &    23\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{23.2532}{23.2532}{76.7084}{99.9616}\\ 
1     & defects & ReduceQuality &     0\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9505}{99.9505}\\ 
2     & defects & RelaxScedule &   -20\% &   43\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & effort & ReduceFunct &    62\% &   28\% & \boxplot{43.8475}{17.8433}{61.6909}{9.78052}{71.4714}\\ 
1     & effort & W &    58\% &   32\% & \boxplot{41.1765}{16.6389}{57.8154}{15.8471}{73.6625}\\ 
1     & effort & ToolsTech &    46\% &   22\% & \boxplot{39.7918}{6.55582}{46.3476}{15.7704}{62.1181}\\ 
1     & effort & ProcMaturity &    24\% &   76\% & \boxplot{0}{23.9029}{23.9029}{49.3219}{73.2248}\\ 
1     & effort & ReduceQuality &     0\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6845}{99.6845}\\ 
1     & effort & Personel &     0\% &  105\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6615}{99.6615}\\ 
2     & effort & RelaxScedule &   -13\% &   35\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & months & ReduceFunct &    37\% &   16\% & \boxplot{26.6932}{9.94021}{36.6334}{6.15848}{42.7918}\\ 
1     & months & Personel &    32\% &   98\% & \boxplot{0}{31.5735}{31.5735}{65.9772}{97.5507}\\ 
1     & months & W &    30\% &   16\% & \boxplot{19.0595}{11.1223}{30.1817}{5.04286}{35.2246}\\ 
1     & months & ToolsTech &    29\% &   26\% & \boxplot{14.7299}{13.9786}{28.7085}{11.5873}{40.2958}\\ 
1     & months & ProcMaturity &    29\% &   33\% & \boxplot{4.70219}{23.8499}{28.5521}{8.68562}{37.2378}\\ 
1     & months & ReduceQuality &     0\% &   98\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{97.619}{97.619}\\ 
2     & months & RelaxScedule &    -3\% &   16\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 

\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the Flight case study.}
\label{fig:drastic-flight}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[!t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r    | @{}r         | @{}c@{}        | @{}c@{}          |        @{}c         |}\hline
  &   &                 & Median  & Spread     & Reduction Quartiles \\
Rank  & Goal & Change & Reduc   & Reduc      &        50\% \\\hline
1     & defects & W &    61\% &   31\% & \boxplot{39.9804}{21.3971}{61.3775}{9.37651}{70.754}\\ 
2     & defects & ProcMaturity &    51\% &   26\% & \boxplot{36.3997}{14.2095}{50.6093}{11.7326}{62.3418}\\ 
2     & defects & ReduceFunct &    46\% &   34\% & \boxplot{19.5518}{26.186}{45.7378}{8.24621}{53.984}\\ 
2     & defects & Tools\&Tech &    39\% &   32\% & \boxplot{20.2431}{19.0903}{39.3334}{12.5144}{51.8478}\\ 
2     & defects & ReduceQuality &     0\% &  382\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{49.9778}{49.9778}\\ 
2     & defects & Personel &     0\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9678}{99.9678}\\ 
3     & defects & RelaxScedule &   -30\% &   78\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & effort & W &    60\% &   28\% & \boxplot{44.0169}{16.078}{60.0949}{11.7997}{71.8946}\\ 
2     & effort & ProcMaturity &    51\% &   29\% & \boxplot{26.9066}{23.7364}{50.643}{5.25293}{55.8959}\\ 
2     & effort & ReduceFunct &    48\% &   36\% & \boxplot{17.2333}{30.3014}{47.5348}{5.44276}{52.9775}\\ 
2     & effort & Tools\&Tech &    47\% &   45\% & \boxplot{14.6207}{32.1248}{46.7455}{12.9531}{59.6987}\\ 
2     & effort & ReduceQuality &     5\% &  257\% & \boxplot{0}{5.40665}{5.40665}{78.8937}{84.3003}\\ 
2     & effort & Personel &     0\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.7286}{99.7286}\\ 
3     & effort & RelaxScedule &   -21\% &   64\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & months & ProcMaturity &    31\% &   15\% & \boxplot{24.5264}{6.82694}{31.3534}{8.13095}{39.4843}\\ 
2     & months & W &    30\% &   17\% & \boxplot{21.628}{8.26094}{29.8889}{8.25812}{38.147}\\ 
2     & months & Personel &    29\% &   98\% & \boxplot{0}{28.9032}{28.9032}{68.7159}{97.619}\\ 
2     & months & Tools\&Tech &    25\% &   17\% & \boxplot{11.9752}{13.3381}{25.3133}{4.09821}{29.4115}\\ 
2     & months & ReduceFunct &    25\% &    9\% & \boxplot{19.5313}{5.17903}{24.7103}{3.94744}{28.6578}\\ 
2     & months & ReduceQuality &     4\% &   61\% & \boxplot{0}{3.77155}{3.77155}{57.1777}{60.9492}\\ 
3     & months & RelaxScedule &    -7\% &   16\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 

\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the OSP case study.}
\label{fig:drastic-osp}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[!t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r    | @{}r         | @{}c@{}        | @{}c@{}          |        @{}c         |}\hline
  &   &                 & Median  & Spread     & Reduction Quartiles \\
Rank  & Goal & Change & Reduc   & Reduc      &        50\% \\\hline
1     & defects & W &    64\% &   40\% & \boxplot{33.7044}{29.8888}{63.5933}{10.2353}{73.8286}\\ 
1     & defects & Tools\&Tech &    57\% &   24\% & \boxplot{46.5933}{10.2122}{56.8054}{13.7313}{70.5367}\\ 
1     & defects & ReduceFunct &    50\% &   29\% & \boxplot{29.2767}{20.2878}{49.5645}{8.96353}{58.528}\\ 
1     & defects & Personel &    28\% &   75\% & \boxplot{0}{28.1634}{28.1634}{47.0473}{75.2106}\\ 
1     & defects & ProcMaturity &    24\% &   38\% & \boxplot{8.1586}{15.4142}{23.5728}{22.1881}{45.7608}\\ 
1     & defects & ReduceQuality &     0\% &  163\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9642}{99.9642}\\ 
1     & defects & RelaxScedule &   -17\% &   71\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & effort & ReduceFunct &    63\% &   27\% & \boxplot{41.8165}{20.9431}{62.7596}{6.51631}{69.2759}\\ 
1     & effort & W &    60\% &   45\% & \boxplot{30.5875}{29.7158}{60.3033}{15.0656}{75.3689}\\ 
1     & effort & Toolss\&Tech &    57\% &   36\% & \boxplot{31.7594}{24.764}{56.5235}{11.1771}{67.7005}\\ 
1     & effort & ReduceQuality &    50\% &  100\% & \boxplot{0}{50.4902}{50.4902}{49.1694}{99.6597}\\ 
1     & effort & Personel &    19\% &   78\% & \boxplot{0}{18.771}{18.771}{58.7931}{77.5641}\\ 
1     & effort & ProcMaturity &    14\% &   49\% & \boxplot{0}{13.5691}{13.5691}{23.382}{36.9511}\\ 
2     & effort & RelaxScedule &   -43\% &   91\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 
1     & months & W &    35\% &   21\% & \boxplot{20.8333}{13.7434}{34.5767}{7.70753}{42.2842}\\ 
1     & months & Toolss\&Tech &    30\% &   15\% & \boxplot{24.8738}{4.85903}{29.7328}{9.79879}{39.5316}\\ 
1     & months & ReduceFunct &    26\% &   12\% & \boxplot{23.9494}{2.52485}{26.4742}{9.21101}{35.6852}\\ 
1     & months & Personel &    25\% &   45\% & \boxplot{4.3956}{21.0109}{25.4065}{23.9701}{49.3766}\\ 
1     & months & ProcMaturity &    12\% &   21\% & \boxplot{4.36853}{7.42702}{11.7956}{13.5891}{25.3847}\\ 
1     & months & ReduceQuality &     6\% &   98\% & \boxplot{0}{6.30734}{6.30734}{91.2829}{97.5902}\\ 
2     & months & RelaxScedule &   -16\% &   25\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 

\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the OSP2 case study.}
\label{fig:drastic-osp2}
\end{figure}
