\chapter{ToDo}
%\section{Today}
\be
\item Add \dix{HowToReproduce}
\ee

\chapter{Done}
\begin{comment}
\section{Tuesday}
\be
\item Fix committee members
\item i cannot find a reference fo table 4.10 in the text. so i am suspicious. do you mention, ever, the results on pages 61 to 65? \textbf{These are referenced on \pg{4-10} in the last paragraph of \stion{close-look}}
\item ditto with table 5.28 and the results around it \textbf{I will detail where each table in that chapter is referenced below.}
\be
\item[\pg{results-1}] \tbl{results-WC}, \tbl{results-CC}, \tbl{results-WC-Log}, an \tbl{results-CC-Log}
\item[\pg{results-2}] \tbl{burak-wcb-clump}, \tbl{burak-wcb-nb}, \tbl{burak-ccb-nb}, \tbl{burak-ccl-clump}, \tbl{burak-ccl-nb}, \tbl{burak-ccl-oner} Directly. \tbl{burak-wcn-lwl}, \tbl{burak-wcn-j48}, \tbl{burak-wcn-jrip}, \tbl{burak-wcn-oner}, \tbl{burak-wcn-ridor}, \tbl{burak-wcl-clump}, \tbl{burak-wcl-nb}, \tbl{burak-wcl-lwl}, \tbl{burak-wcl-j48}, \tbl{burak-wcl-jrip}, \tbl{burak-wcl-oner}, \tbl{burak-wcl-ridor}, \tbl{burak-ccn-clump}, \tbl{burak-ccn-lwl}, \tbl{burak-ccn-j48}, \tbl{burak-ccn-jrip}, \tbl{burak-ccn-oner}, \tbl{burak-ccn-ridor}, \tbl{burak-ccl-lwl}, \tbl{burak-ccl-j48}, \tbl{burak-ccl-jrip}, and \tbl{burak-ccl-ridor} in a range.
\item[\pg{results-3}] \tbl{GAC-ar3}, \tbl{GAC-ar5}, \tbl{GAC-mc2}, and \tbl{GAC-all} directly. \tbl{GAC-ar4}, \tbl{GAC-cm1}, \tbl{GAC-kc1}, \tbl{GAC-kc2}, \tbl{GAC-kc3}, and \tbl{GAC-mw1} in a range
\item[\pg{results-4}] \tbl{KMeans-ar5}, \tbl{KMeans-kc3}, and \tbl{KMeans-all} directly. \tbl{KMeans-ar3}, \tbl{KMeans-ar4}, \tbl{KMeans-cm1}, \tbl{KMeans-kc1}, \tbl{KMeans-kc2}, \tbl{KMeans-mc2}, and \tbl{KMeans-mw1} in a range.
\ee
\item why is fig 5.1 on page 86? should it not be much much earlier (since earlier experiments also use it).\textbf{Moved to \pg{attribute-clustering}. Other tests use different versions of the datasets. Do you want one of these for those as well?}
\item Naive Bayes has 2 different costs. Re \fig{complexity} and \tion{nb}. \textbf{Chanaged \stion{nb}'s complexity to equal \fig{complexity}. Added appropriate documentation to describe n and k.}
\item Make sure I reference the authors of the classification algorithms in \tion{classification-algorithms2} \textbf{Done.}
\item I list the phases of software development in \chap{intro}, and need to get back to that. \textbf{I added a little more on this, but don't really know what else needs said on it. The point of including this was to show when you can use SDP, and when other methods should be used. Any input?}
\item Fix ripper pseudo code: \url{http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~timm/cs591o/old/images/ripper.png} \textbf{Changed pseudo code in \fig{pseudoCode-ripper}, and cited the url}
\item Check fig 2.12, 2.13, and 2.14 \textbf{I am certain of \fig{pseudoCode-kd}. \fig{pseudoCode-ball} and \fig{pseudoCode-cover} came from the cited papers. I am confidant that \fig{pseudoCode-ball} is correct. I plan on finding a better example of \fig{pseudoCode-cover}, as I am not fond on the one I am currently using.}
\item \fig{pseudoCode-naivebayes} need to initialize variables. Need to show where it selects highest class \textbf{Modified it to show this}.
\item Need to reference adaboost in \tion{boosting} \textbf{Added in \stion{adaboost}}
\item Add results about the simplicity of the learned theories and number of rules, number of conditions per rule, etcetera \textbf{Added this to \stion{clump-rule-complexity}. See \tbl{numberOfRules} and \tbl{numberOfConditions}.}
\item Expand on summary of \chap{results} \textbf{Added a little to this section.}
\ee

\section{Wednesday}
\be
\item Capitalize heading \tion{results-summary}.
\item the following sentence makes no sense. first, you call c4.5 a non-local learner. then you say it is a local learner? it seems to me that for your thesis, you need to call c4.5 and oneR non-local: \textbf{This has been removed, and replaced with a more accurate representation of what that section's results actually should be. (\pg{confusingLine})}
\begin{quote}
"The second group are non-locality  based learners such as C4.5, OneR, and Naive Bayes. Of this second group, only Naive Bayes has  no notion of locality. OneR and C4.5 are included in the non-locality based classiﬁcation algorithms because the notion of locality contained in these algorithms come from a recursive division  of the search space. "
\end{quote}
\item fix c4.5 pseudo code: missing details. post pruning. discretization of numeric attribites. \textbf{Added the information to \fig{pseudoCode-c45}}
\item Fix missing references \textbf{Done, except for 1. What paper does this quote come from? (Its one you printed off the one page from, and said to include it, I never got a title)\begin{quote}"NASA is a much more diverse organization than is commonly appreciated. NASA software is written by layers of contractors working for different companies around the nation. Arguing that all ISO-compliant organizations are the same is like saying that a CMM level3 weapons manufacturer is writing the same software as a CMM level3 finance company."\end{quote}}
\item Ridor is not ripples, its a greedy search thru the space of rules of arity=1. There is no mention of the RDR ifTrue/ifFalse branches of the use of the different list calculation to determine candidates for patching. \textbf{Waiting on hearing back from you on Ridor not being Ripples. Added information about the shrinking attribute list and more on the if-true and if-false. \stion{RIDOR}}
\item Added some to \chap{conclusion}
\ee

\section{Thursday}
\be
\item Get correct pseudo code for EM. See \url{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation-maximization_algorithm} \textbf{This section, and the resultant pseudo code , has been redacted}
\item Get better pseudo code for cover trees \textbf{Pseudo code removed.}
\item Add dedication \textbf{Added to \pg{dedication}}
\item Add new chart that is duplicate of fig 5.1 to chap 4 with the attributes for the lwl test and results in 5.1. \textbf{Added \fig{attribute-clustering-main} and supporting documentation to \stion{datasets}}
\item \textbf{Spell check done.}
\item Finish \chap{conclusion}
\item Add what the Burak filter working on UCI but not SDP says about the burak effect
\ee
\end{comment}
\section{Friday}
\be
\item grammer check, and typo check
\item Add Acknowlegement
\ee
