\begin{figure}[!t] \begin{center} {\scriptsize \begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r | @{}r | @{}c@{} | @{}c@{} | @{}c |}\hline & & & Median & Spread & Reduction Quartiles \\ Rank & Goal & Change & Reduc & Reduc & 50\% \\\hline 1 & defects & ReduceFunct & 64\% & 28\% & \boxplot{45.7467}{18.5461}{64.2928}{9.93909}{74.2319}\\ 1 & defects & W & 54\% & 32\% & \boxplot{33.117}{21.349}{54.466}{10.4747}{64.9407}\\ 1 & defects & Tools\&Tech & 51\% & 39\% & \boxplot{33.1779}{17.372}{50.5499}{21.6912}{72.2411}\\ 1 & defects & ProcMaturity & 39\% & 73\% & \boxplot{0}{38.5634}{38.5634}{33.5112}{72.0746}\\ 2 & defects & Personel & 23\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{23.2532}{23.2532}{76.7084}{99.9616}\\ 3 & defects & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9505}{99.9505}\\ 4 & defects & RelaxScedule & -20\% & 43\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & effort & ReduceFunct & 62\% & 28\% & \boxplot{43.8475}{17.8433}{61.6909}{9.78052}{71.4714}\\ 2 & effort & W & 58\% & 32\% & \boxplot{41.1765}{16.6389}{57.8154}{15.8471}{73.6625}\\ 2 & effort & Tools\&Tech & 46\% & 22\% & \boxplot{39.7918}{6.55582}{46.3476}{15.7704}{62.1181}\\ 2 & effort & ProcMaturity & 24\% & 76\% & \boxplot{0}{23.9029}{23.9029}{49.3219}{73.2248}\\ 2 & effort & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6845}{99.6845}\\ 2 & effort & Personel & 0\% & 105\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6615}{99.6615}\\ 3 & effort & RelaxScedule & -13\% & 35\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & months & ReduceFunct & 37\% & 16\% & \boxplot{26.6932}{9.94021}{36.6334}{6.15848}{42.7918}\\ 1 & months & Personel & 32\% & 98\% & \boxplot{0}{31.5735}{31.5735}{65.9772}{97.5507}\\ 1 & months & W & 30\% & 16\% & \boxplot{19.0595}{11.1223}{30.1817}{5.04286}{35.2246}\\ 1 & months & Tools\&Tech & 29\% & 26\% & \boxplot{14.7299}{13.9786}{28.7085}{11.5873}{40.2958}\\ 1 & months & ProcMaturity & 29\% & 33\% & \boxplot{4.70219}{23.8499}{28.5521}{8.68562}{37.2378}\\ 1 & months & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 98\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{97.619}{97.619}\\ 2 & months & RelaxScedule & -3\% & 16\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline \end{tabular}} \end{center} \caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the Ground case study.} \label{fig:drastic-ground} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[!t] \begin{center} {\scriptsize \begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r | @{}r | @{}c@{} | @{}c@{} | @{}c |}\hline & & & Median & Spread & Reduction Quartiles \\ Rank & Goal & Change & Reduc & Reduc & 50\% \\\hline 1 & defects & ReduceFunct & 64\% & 28\% & \boxplot{45.7467}{18.5461}{64.2928}{9.93909}{74.2319}\\ 1 & defects & W & 54\% & 32\% & \boxplot{33.117}{21.349}{54.466}{10.4747}{64.9407}\\ 1 & defects & Tools\&Tech & 51\% & 39\% & \boxplot{33.1779}{17.372}{50.5499}{21.6912}{72.2411}\\ 1 & defects & ProcMaturity & 39\% & 73\% & \boxplot{0}{38.5634}{38.5634}{33.5112}{72.0746}\\ 1 & defects & Personel & 23\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{23.2532}{23.2532}{76.7084}{99.9616}\\ 1 & defects & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9505}{99.9505}\\ 2 & defects & RelaxScedule & -20\% & 43\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & effort & ReduceFunct & 62\% & 28\% & \boxplot{43.8475}{17.8433}{61.6909}{9.78052}{71.4714}\\ 1 & effort & W & 58\% & 32\% & \boxplot{41.1765}{16.6389}{57.8154}{15.8471}{73.6625}\\ 1 & effort & Tools\&Tech & 46\% & 22\% & \boxplot{39.7918}{6.55582}{46.3476}{15.7704}{62.1181}\\ 1 & effort & ProcMaturity & 24\% & 76\% & \boxplot{0}{23.9029}{23.9029}{49.3219}{73.2248}\\ 1 & effort & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6845}{99.6845}\\ 1 & effort & Personel & 0\% & 105\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.6615}{99.6615}\\ 2 & effort & RelaxScedule & -13\% & 35\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & months & ReduceFunct & 37\% & 16\% & \boxplot{26.6932}{9.94021}{36.6334}{6.15848}{42.7918}\\ 1 & months & Personel & 32\% & 98\% & \boxplot{0}{31.5735}{31.5735}{65.9772}{97.5507}\\ 1 & months & W & 30\% & 16\% & \boxplot{19.0595}{11.1223}{30.1817}{5.04286}{35.2246}\\ 1 & months & Tools\&Tech & 29\% & 26\% & \boxplot{14.7299}{13.9786}{28.7085}{11.5873}{40.2958}\\ 1 & months & ProcMaturity & 29\% & 33\% & \boxplot{4.70219}{23.8499}{28.5521}{8.68562}{37.2378}\\ 1 & months & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 98\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{97.619}{97.619}\\ 2 & months & RelaxScedule & -3\% & 16\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline \end{tabular}} \end{center} \caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the Flight case study.} \label{fig:drastic-flight} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[!t] \begin{center} {\scriptsize \begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r | @{}r | @{}c@{} | @{}c@{} | @{}c |}\hline & & & Median & Spread & Reduction Quartiles \\ Rank & Goal & Change & Reduc & Reduc & 50\% \\\hline 1 & defects & W & 61\% & 31\% & \boxplot{39.9804}{21.3971}{61.3775}{9.37651}{70.754}\\ 2 & defects & ProcMaturity & 51\% & 26\% & \boxplot{36.3997}{14.2095}{50.6093}{11.7326}{62.3418}\\ 2 & defects & ReduceFunct & 46\% & 34\% & \boxplot{19.5518}{26.186}{45.7378}{8.24621}{53.984}\\ 2 & defects & Tools\&Tech & 39\% & 32\% & \boxplot{20.2431}{19.0903}{39.3334}{12.5144}{51.8478}\\ 2 & defects & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 382\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{49.9778}{49.9778}\\ 2 & defects & Personel & 0\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9678}{99.9678}\\ 3 & defects & RelaxScedule & -30\% & 78\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & effort & W & 60\% & 28\% & \boxplot{44.0169}{16.078}{60.0949}{11.7997}{71.8946}\\ 2 & effort & ProcMaturity & 51\% & 29\% & \boxplot{26.9066}{23.7364}{50.643}{5.25293}{55.8959}\\ 2 & effort & ReduceFunct & 48\% & 36\% & \boxplot{17.2333}{30.3014}{47.5348}{5.44276}{52.9775}\\ 2 & effort & Tools\&Tech & 47\% & 45\% & \boxplot{14.6207}{32.1248}{46.7455}{12.9531}{59.6987}\\ 2 & effort & ReduceQuality & 5\% & 257\% & \boxplot{0}{5.40665}{5.40665}{78.8937}{84.3003}\\ 2 & effort & Personel & 0\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.7286}{99.7286}\\ 3 & effort & RelaxScedule & -21\% & 64\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & months & ProcMaturity & 31\% & 15\% & \boxplot{24.5264}{6.82694}{31.3534}{8.13095}{39.4843}\\ 2 & months & W & 30\% & 17\% & \boxplot{21.628}{8.26094}{29.8889}{8.25812}{38.147}\\ 2 & months & Personel & 29\% & 98\% & \boxplot{0}{28.9032}{28.9032}{68.7159}{97.619}\\ 2 & months & Tools\&Tech & 25\% & 17\% & \boxplot{11.9752}{13.3381}{25.3133}{4.09821}{29.4115}\\ 2 & months & ReduceFunct & 25\% & 9\% & \boxplot{19.5313}{5.17903}{24.7103}{3.94744}{28.6578}\\ 2 & months & ReduceQuality & 4\% & 61\% & \boxplot{0}{3.77155}{3.77155}{57.1777}{60.9492}\\ 3 & months & RelaxScedule & -7\% & 16\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline \end{tabular}} \end{center} \caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the OSP case study.} \label{fig:drastic-osp} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[!t] \begin{center} {\scriptsize \begin{tabular}{|@{}c@{}| r | @{}r | @{}c@{} | @{}c@{} | @{}c |}\hline & & & Median & Spread & Reduction Quartiles \\ Rank & Goal & Change & Reduc & Reduc & 50\% \\\hline 1 & defects & W & 64\% & 40\% & \boxplot{33.7044}{29.8888}{63.5933}{10.2353}{73.8286}\\ 1 & defects & Tools\&Tech & 57\% & 24\% & \boxplot{46.5933}{10.2122}{56.8054}{13.7313}{70.5367}\\ 1 & defects & ReduceFunct & 50\% & 29\% & \boxplot{29.2767}{20.2878}{49.5645}{8.96353}{58.528}\\ 1 & defects & Personel & 28\% & 75\% & \boxplot{0}{28.1634}{28.1634}{47.0473}{75.2106}\\ 1 & defects & ProcMaturity & 24\% & 38\% & \boxplot{8.1586}{15.4142}{23.5728}{22.1881}{45.7608}\\ 1 & defects & ReduceQuality & 0\% & 163\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{99.9642}{99.9642}\\ 1 & defects & RelaxScedule & -17\% & 71\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & effort & ReduceFunct & 63\% & 27\% & \boxplot{41.8165}{20.9431}{62.7596}{6.51631}{69.2759}\\ 1 & effort & W & 60\% & 45\% & \boxplot{30.5875}{29.7158}{60.3033}{15.0656}{75.3689}\\ 1 & effort & Toolss\&Tech & 57\% & 36\% & \boxplot{31.7594}{24.764}{56.5235}{11.1771}{67.7005}\\ 1 & effort & ReduceQuality & 50\% & 100\% & \boxplot{0}{50.4902}{50.4902}{49.1694}{99.6597}\\ 1 & effort & Personel & 19\% & 78\% & \boxplot{0}{18.771}{18.771}{58.7931}{77.5641}\\ 1 & effort & ProcMaturity & 14\% & 49\% & \boxplot{0}{13.5691}{13.5691}{23.382}{36.9511}\\ 2 & effort & RelaxScedule & -43\% & 91\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline 1 & months & W & 35\% & 21\% & \boxplot{20.8333}{13.7434}{34.5767}{7.70753}{42.2842}\\ 1 & months & Toolss\&Tech & 30\% & 15\% & \boxplot{24.8738}{4.85903}{29.7328}{9.79879}{39.5316}\\ 1 & months & ReduceFunct & 26\% & 12\% & \boxplot{23.9494}{2.52485}{26.4742}{9.21101}{35.6852}\\ 1 & months & Personel & 25\% & 45\% & \boxplot{4.3956}{21.0109}{25.4065}{23.9701}{49.3766}\\ 1 & months & ProcMaturity & 12\% & 21\% & \boxplot{4.36853}{7.42702}{11.7956}{13.5891}{25.3847}\\ 1 & months & ReduceQuality & 6\% & 98\% & \boxplot{0}{6.30734}{6.30734}{91.2829}{97.5902}\\ 2 & months & RelaxScedule & -16\% & 25\% & \boxplot{0}{0}{0}{0}{0}\\\hline \end{tabular}} \end{center} \caption{Comparing defect, effort, and month estimation reduction percentages ($100*\frac{initial-final}{intial}$ of drastic business decisions vs {\W}'s recommendations for the OSP2 case study.} \label{fig:drastic-osp2} \end{figure}