\begin{figure}
\footnotesize
\begin{center}
\footnotesize
\begin{tabular}{r|rr|r}
&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{number of classes}\\\cline{2-4}
feature	&4&	5	&average\\\hline
us&		10&	10&	10.0\\
am&	    9&	9&	9.0\\
ex&		8&	9&	8.5\\
rm&		6&	9&	7.5\\
ra&		5&	5&	5.0\\
ss&	    5&	4&	4.5\\
fr&		6&	1&	3.5\\
uc&		6&	1&	3.5\\
do&		3&	3&	3.0\\
cl&		4&	2&	3.0\\
dt&		2&	&	2.0\\
pf&		2&	&	2.0\\
cx&		2&	2&	2.0\\
di&		2&	1&	1.5\\
as&		2&	1&	1.5\\
hs&		1&	1&	1.0
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Number of times a feature was selected in 10y
experiments where features were assessed using 90\% of
the data (selected at random).}\label{fig:fss}
\end{figure}

%\begin{figure}
%\scriptsize
%\begin{alltt}
%fr <= 1 AND ex >= 2             => ungood (71.0/0.0)
%hs >= 1 AND ex >= 3 AND ex <= 3 => ungood (3.0/0.0)
%otherwise                       => good (137.0/4.0)
%\end{alltt}
%\caption{Rules from 2e. $F=0.98$.}\label{fig:2e}
%\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=2in]{tim/comparison.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{EP (error potential) as computed by standard SILAP and \fig{4g}.}\label{fig:comparisons}
\end{figure}
